1978 Citroen LNA vs. 2000 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Citroen LNA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Citroen LNA would be higher.
Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Citroen LNA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Citroen LNA | 2000 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | LNA | Ranger |
Year Released | 1978 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |