1978 Citroen LNA vs. 2008 Mazda 6

To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Citroen LNA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Citroen LNA would be higher. At 2,261 cc, 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1978 Citroen LNA. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1978 Citroen LNA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 674 kg more than 1978 Citroen LNA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Citroen LNA. (49 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Citroen LNA.

Compare all specifications:

1978 Citroen LNA 2008 Mazda 6
Make Citroen Mazda
Model LNA 6
Year Released 1978 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 652 cc 2261 cc
Horse Power 35 HP 156 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 49 Nm 207 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.6:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 710 kg 1384 kg
Vehicle Length 3390 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 2240 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 64 L