1978 Citroen LNA vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Citroen LNA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Citroen LNA would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 741 kg more than 1978 Citroen LNA.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 351 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Citroen LNA. (49 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Citroen LNA.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Citroen LNA | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | LNA | C30 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 652 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 49 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |