1978 Daihatsu Taft vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,530 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 133 more horse power than 1978 Daihatsu Taft. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1978 Daihatsu Taft.
Because 1978 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (202 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Daihatsu Taft. (150 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Daihatsu Taft. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 1978 Daihatsu Taft has manual transmission. 1978 Daihatsu Taft will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Daihatsu Taft | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Daihatsu | Mitsubishi |
Model | Taft | FTO |
Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
Engine Size | 2530 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 202 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1300 mm |