1978 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2002 Mazda 2
To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,530 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 2 (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1978 Daihatsu Taft. (62 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1978 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 25 kg more than 2002 Mazda 2.
Because 1978 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda 2 (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Daihatsu Taft. (150 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Daihatsu Taft | 2002 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Mazda |
Model | Taft | 2 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2530 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2500 mm |