1978 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 1954 Riley RM A
To start off, 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp weights approximately 469 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp has automatic transmission and 1954 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1954 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 De Tomaso Longchamp | 1954 Riley RM A | |
Make | De Tomaso | Riley |
Model | Longchamp | RM A |
Year Released | 1978 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 5763 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1704 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2870 mm |