1978 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp would be higher.
Because 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp. (450 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp.
Compare all specifications:
1978 De Tomaso Longchamp | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
Make | De Tomaso | Holden |
Model | Longchamp | XU 6 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 450 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |