1978 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp would be higher. At 5,762 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 670 kg more than 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp (450 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-250. (389 Nm). This means 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 De Tomaso Longchamp | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | De Tomaso | Ford |
| Model | Longchamp | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5762 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 389 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 90 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 2370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3510 mm |
