1978 Dodge Aspen vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Dodge Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Dodge Aspen would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (206 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1978 Dodge Aspen. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile should accelerate faster than 1978 Dodge Aspen. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile weights approximately 72 kg more than 1978 Dodge Aspen. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Dodge Aspen. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (353 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Dodge Aspen. (231 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Dodge Aspen.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Dodge Aspen | 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | |
| Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Aspen | Profile |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 206 HP |
| Torque | 231 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2880 mm |
