1978 Dodge Omni vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 1,716 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Dodge Omni is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Dodge Omni weights approximately 255 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Dodge Omni | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Dodge | MCC |
Model | Omni | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1978 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 1810 mm |