1978 Dodge Omni vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG TF weights approximately 195 kg more than 1978 Dodge Omni.
Because 2003 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Dodge Omni | 2003 MG TF | |
| Make | Dodge | MG |
| Model | Omni | TF |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1716 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
| Top Speed | 141 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 50 L |
