1978 Dodge Omni vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1505 kg more than 1978 Dodge Omni.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Dodge Omni. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Dodge Omni | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Dodge | Land Rover |
| Model | Omni | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1716 cc | 2926 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 141 km/hour | 174 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 2500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 100 L |
