1978 Dodge Omni vs. 2009 Ford E-350
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Dodge Omni weights approximately 29 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Because 2009 Ford E-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Dodge Omni | 2009 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Omni | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1716 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 255 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 15 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 132 L |
