1978 Fiat 128 vs. 1966 Ford Mustang

To start off, 1978 Fiat 128 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Mustang (320 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1978 Fiat 128. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1978 Fiat 128. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Mustang weights approximately 304 kg more than 1978 Fiat 128. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Fiat 128, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1966 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 1978 Fiat 128 has manual transmission. 1978 Fiat 128 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1966 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: