1978 Fiat 133 vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Fiat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Fiat 133 would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1978 Fiat 133. (33 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1978 Fiat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 608 kg more than 1978 Fiat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Fiat 133. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Fiat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Fiat 133.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Fiat 133 | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 133 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1978 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 842 cc | 4009 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 54 Nm | 323 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.9:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1298 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2870 mm |