1978 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1952 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1978 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,987 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Maserati A6G (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1978 Fiat Ritmo. (59 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1978 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 310 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G.
Because 1952 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Fiat Ritmo | 1952 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Fiat | Maserati |
Model | Ritmo | A6G |
Year Released | 1978 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1049 cc | 1987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 550 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2290 mm |