1978 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1992 Mazda 626

To start off, 1992 Mazda 626 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (106 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1978 Fiat Ritmo. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1978 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mazda 626 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1978 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 626 (157 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Fiat Ritmo. (81 Nm). This means 1992 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Fiat Ritmo.

Compare all specifications:

1978 Fiat Ritmo 1992 Mazda 626
Make Fiat Mazda
Model Ritmo 626
Year Released 1978 1992
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1049 cc 1840 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 59 HP 106 HP
Torque 81 Nm 157 Nm
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 55.5 mm 85 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 860 kg 1180 kg
Vehicle Length 3940 mm 4680 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2460 mm 2620 mm