1978 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 443 more horse power than 1978 Fiat Ritmo. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1978 Fiat Ritmo.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 532 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Fiat Ritmo. (98 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Fiat Ritmo. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS has automatic transmission and 1978 Fiat Ritmo has manual transmission. 1978 Fiat Ritmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Fiat Ritmo | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
| Make | Fiat | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Ritmo | CLS |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 507 HP |
| Torque | 98 Nm | 630 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 80 L |
