1978 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1978 Fiat Ritmo. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1978 Fiat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Fiat Ritmo. (81 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Fiat Ritmo. 2012 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1978 Fiat Ritmo has manual transmission. 1978 Fiat Ritmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Fiat Ritmo | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Fiat | Holden |
| Model | Ritmo | Epica |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1049 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |
