1978 Ford Falcon vs. 1969 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1978 Ford Falcon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. Both 1978 Ford Falcon and 1969 Ford Mustang are equipped with a 3,273 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Ford Falcon (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1969 Ford Mustang. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Mustang weights approximately 36 kg more than 1978 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Ford Falcon (263 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Ford Mustang. (257 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1978 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Ford Falcon | 1969 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Falcon | Mustang |
Year Released | 1978 | 1969 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 3273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 263 Nm | 257 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1416 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2750 mm |