1978 Ford Granada vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Ford Granada would be higher. At 4,092 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Ford Granada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Ford Granada (96 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Ford Granada should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio.
Because 1978 Ford Granada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Ford Granada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Ford Granada (284 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1978 Ford Granada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Ford Granada | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Granada | Clio |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4092 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 284 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2480 mm |