1978 Ford Monarch vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Ford Monarch weights approximately 430 kg more than 1996 Rover 200.
Because 1978 Ford Monarch is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Ford Monarch. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Ford Monarch has automatic transmission and 1996 Rover 200 has manual transmission. 1996 Rover 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Ford Monarch will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Ford Monarch | 1996 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Monarch | 200 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4122 cc | 1395 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2510 mm |
