1978 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1978 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 270 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Ford Thunderbird | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Thunderbird | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4186 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2540 mm |
