1978 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 2006 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Ford Thunderbird | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Thunderbird | Colt |
Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 179 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2970 mm |