1978 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 305 kg more than 1978 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Ford Thunderbird | 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Thunderbird | Outlander |
Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2630 mm |