1978 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1978 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Ford Thunderbird | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Thunderbird | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 263 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2880 mm |