1978 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Ford Thunderbird would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Ford Thunderbird | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Ford | Smart |
| Model | Thunderbird | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 1867 mm |
