1978 Honda Accord vs. 1950 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1978 Honda Accord is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Honda Accord (79 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 1950 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 180 kg more than 1978 Honda Accord.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Honda Accord. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Honda Accord. (126 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1950 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Honda Accord | 1950 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Honda | Jeep |
Model | Accord | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1978 | 1950 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1602 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2040 mm |