1978 Honda Civic vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1978 Honda Civic is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1960 Toyota Master RR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Honda Civic (53 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 532 kg more than 1978 Honda Civic.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Honda Civic | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Honda | Toyota |
| Model | Civic | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1169 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 678 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2540 mm |
