1978 Lada 1600 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1978 Lada 1600 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Lada 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Lada 1600 (78 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Lada 1600 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 180 kg more than 1978 Lada 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Lada 1600 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Lada | Toyota |
| Model | 1600 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1568 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 40 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 39 L | 75 L |
