1978 Lada S vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Lada S would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Lada S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Lada S weights approximately 30 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 1978 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1978 Lada S has manual transmission. 1978 Lada S will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Lada S | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Lada | MCC |
Model | S | Smart |
Year Released | 1978 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 73 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 47 L |