1978 Lancia A 112 vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Lancia A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Lancia A 112 would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 735 kg more than 1978 Lancia A 112.
Because 1996 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Lancia A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 1978 Lancia A 112 has manual transmission. 1978 Lancia A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Lancia A 112 | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Lancia | Ford |
| Model | A 112 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 655 kg | 1390 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2580 mm |
