1978 Lancia Beta vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1978 Lancia Beta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1978 Lancia Beta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 307 kg more than 1978 Lancia Beta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 6 (240 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Lancia Beta. (134 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Lancia Beta | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Beta | 6 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 174 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1038 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |