1978 Lancia Megagamma vs. 2000 Matra-Simca M72
To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Lancia Megagamma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Lancia Megagamma would be higher. In terms of performance, 1978 Lancia Megagamma (138 HP) has 88 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Lancia Megagamma should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Because 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Matra-Simca M72. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Lancia Megagamma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Lancia Megagamma | 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | |
Make | Lancia | Matra-Simca |
Model | Megagamma | M72 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 50 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |