1978 Lancia Megagamma vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Lancia Megagamma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Lancia Megagamma would be higher. At 2,484 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Lancia Megagamma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1978 Lancia Megagamma. (138 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 1978 Lancia Megagamma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Nea weights approximately 330 kg more than 1978 Lancia Megagamma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Lancia Megagamma. (206 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Lancia Megagamma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Lancia Megagamma | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
| Make | Lancia | Lancia |
| Model | Megagamma | Nea |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2484 cc | 2445 cc |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 206 Nm | 314 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1370 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2590 mm |
