1978 Lincoln Mark VI vs. 2004 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2004 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Lincoln Mark VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Lincoln Mark VI would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Lincoln Mark VI is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Lincoln Mark VI (139 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Lincoln Mark VI should accelerate faster than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Lincoln Mark VI (359 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1978 Lincoln Mark VI will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Lincoln Mark VI | 2004 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Proton |
| Model | Mark VI | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 5733 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5570 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2610 mm |
