1978 Matra-Simca Rancho vs. 2011 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2011 Nissan Rogue is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Matra-Simca Rancho. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Matra-Simca Rancho would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1978 Matra-Simca Rancho. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1978 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Matra-Simca Rancho. (118 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Matra-Simca Rancho | 2011 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Nissan |
Model | Rancho | Rogue |
Year Released | 1978 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1442 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4681 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1659 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |