1978 Matra-Simca Rancho vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Matra-Simca Rancho. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Matra-Simca Rancho would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (110 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1978 Matra-Simca Rancho. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1978 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (153 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Matra-Simca Rancho. (118 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Matra-Simca Rancho | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Holden |
Model | Rancho | Cruze |
Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1442 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 153 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2685 mm |