1978 Mazda 121 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 121. (86 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 121. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 626 kg more than 1978 Mazda 121. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 121. (160 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 121.

Compare all specifications:

1978 Mazda 121 2010 Cadillac CTS
Make Mazda Cadillac
Model 121 CTS
Year Released 1978 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1970 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 86 HP 270 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 160 Nm 302 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 5700 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1130 kg 1756 kg
Vehicle Length 4510 mm 4867 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1504 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2880 mm