1978 Mazda 121 vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 343 kg more than 1978 Mazda 121.
Because 1978 Mazda 121 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 121. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 121 | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 121 | C30 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 227 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1453 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4265 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2639 mm |