1978 Mazda 323 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Aveo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Aveo weights approximately 280 kg more than 1978 Mazda 323.
Because 1978 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mazda 323 | 2010 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
| Model | 323 | Aveo |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1415 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3919 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1679 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1506 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2479 mm |
