1978 Mazda 323 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 725 kg more than 1978 Mazda 323.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Mazda 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando has automatic transmission and 1978 Mazda 323 has manual transmission. 1978 Mazda 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mazda 323 | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
| Model | 323 | Orlando |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1415 cc | 2384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 174 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4652 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1633 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2760 mm |
