1978 Mazda 323 vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 675 kg more than 1978 Mazda 323.
Because 1978 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford C-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 323 | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 323 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1415 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 95 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2788 mm |