1978 Mazda 616 vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 1978 Mazda 616 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,776 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda 616 (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda 616 should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Volvo 220 weights approximately 103 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1964 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 616 | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 616 | 220 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2610 mm |