1978 Mazda 616 vs. 1968 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1978 Mazda 616 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1968 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 298 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 NSU Ro 80 (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1968 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 616 | 1968 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Mazda | NSU |
Model | 616 | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1968 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2390 cc |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2870 mm |