1978 Mazda 616 vs. 1972 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 1978 Mazda 616 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Datsun 240Z (151 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Datsun 240Z should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Datsun 240Z weights approximately 156 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Datsun 240Z (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1972 Datsun 240Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mazda 616 | 1972 Datsun 240Z | |
| Make | Mazda | Datsun |
| Model | 616 | 240Z |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 151 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 1068 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2300 mm |
