1978 Mazda 616 vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1980 Toyota Celica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 2,366 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Celica (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Toyota Celica weights approximately 268 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Toyota Celica (175 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1980 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 616 | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | 616 | Celica |
Year Released | 1978 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2510 mm |