1978 Mazda 616 vs. 1981 Zastava 132
To start off, 1981 Zastava 132 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 132 (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 132 weights approximately 183 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Zastava 132 (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1981 Zastava 132 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 616 | 1981 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Mazda | Zastava |
Model | 616 | 132 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2560 mm |