1978 Mazda 616 vs. 1995 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1995 Mazda Midge is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mazda 616 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda 616 (79 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1995 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda 616 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda Midge weights approximately 54 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda 616 (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1978 Mazda 616 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Mazda 616 | 1995 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Mazda | Mazda |
| Model | 616 | Midge |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
