1978 Mazda 616 vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 1996 Rover 400 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 400 (85 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 400 weights approximately 308 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 400 (170 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Rover 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Mazda 616 | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 616 | 400 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 912 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2630 mm |